All the rules we have seen so far maintain connectedness. It is, however, straightforward to set up rules that do not. An obvious example is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac873/ac87380f7ff9effbf82ff5fdf8104f771821591f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a792/2a7920b84d2284d005f9a5838fe8d22172894cbb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45002/45002d138f9a2b682887a27abb1dc815185daec7" alt=""
At step n, there are 2n+1 components altogether, with the largest component having n + 1 relations.
Rules that are themselves connected can produce disconnected results:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84e5d/84e5dca2e9b7e2a0dfbe220f97db0af06627433e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f500/1f5006c912b388023a3217eeeab31eb046fa83dd" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4965/e49654853e6866468273ae66fbd3f421adfa6e43" alt=""
Rules whose left-hand sides are connected in a sense operate locally on hypergraphs. But rules with disconnected left-hand sides (such as {{x},{y}}→{{x,y}}) can operate non-locally and in effect knit together elements from anywhere—though such a process is almost inevitably rife with ambiguity.